What is Telecoupling? Part 2

What is Telecoupling? Part 2

Dec. 16, 2013

Jackie Hulina was a master's student in the Michigan State University's Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability. 

When last we met, I threw a bunch of jargon around. 

If you’re anything like me, you wonder what all this jargon is and why it’s necessary. Systems and agents might make sense, but how do you decide which ones are relevant?  What is a flow and how do you measure it? You thought you understand causes and effects, but now you’re questioning what that even means. Then there’s the biggest question of them all: how is telecoupling any different than collecting and sorting a bunch of previous research?

Systems describe places where humans and their activities somehow interact with the environment and/or its inhabitants. 

 For the Kirtland’s warbler, there are two major systems: breeding and wintering habitats. Recall from our Michigan Recipe for KW that breeding systems are generally characterized by young jack pines, cowbird removal, and lots of habitat management. Wintering systems are similar in habitat structure, but very different as far as human involvement due to complex land ownership laws. 

Technically breeding and wintering systems can each be referred to as “sending” or “receiving,” depending on your perspective.  Since seasonal variations (ex. temperature, rainfall) in the Bahamas affect Kirtland’s warblers’ breeding success, it makes the most sense to classify wintering systems as “sending” and breeding systems as “receiving.” 

~ Interesting fact: Drought in the Bahamas causes Kirtland's warblers to arrive
later for the breeding season, which reduces their breeding success.
See paper here. ~

The spillover systems can be anything that affects or is affected by the sending/receiving systems.    Admittedly, this is a much more abstract idea.  We tend to have less information about anything that is not a direct cause-effect relationship, but indirect relationships can be crucial – especially collectively.  Since we don’t know much about them, spillover systems pose a huge opportunity for further research. 

Think about it in terms of migration.  Kirtland’s warblers migrate from one place to another, but are theyKirtland's warbler, telecoupled graphic stopping anywhere in between? If so, where? Any stopover sites during migration would be considered spillover systems.  If for some reason stopover sites were becoming less suitable for KW (ex. habitat fragmentation, reduced food sources), populations would decline even if every aspect of breeding and wintering systems was perfect. 

If migration doesn’t suit you, think about it in terms of spreading ideas.  There are people who live nowhere near jack pine forests that have heard of Kirtland’s warblers – especially with the help of the internet!  Some extreme birders have traveled to see KW in their natural habitat, spent money in local shops, and brought what they learned back to their hometowns.  Ideas spread, people feel motivated to give money to the cause, and overall there is political support for continued habitat management.  

Agents are any decision-makers that change flows of information, energy, or materials between systems

Kirtland’s warblers are agents that convert food to fat stores (aka energy) for migration between systems.  A variety of government agencies, NGOs, and the general public act as agents that share ideas and money to influence policy.  Other agents may develop habitat for business goals, or purposefully disturb habitat at particular time intervals to sustainably manage habitat for KW.  

The major cause of the telecoupling is that Kirtland’s warblers migrate for food availability.  Other causes of complexity in the telecoupling include the impacts of climate change, brood parasitism by cowbirds, lots of communication between government agencies, and a cultural responsibility to help species that are declining because of human activities. 

What is happening because of the telecoupling that otherwise we would not see?  Effects are the environmental or socioeconomic results of interactions between systems.  For example, the study mentioned earlier on drought in the Bahamas leading to reduced breeding success is an ecological effect of the telecoupling.

How is this different than just dressing up collections of previous research with a fancy name? 

To an extent, it is – telecoupling is a new term used to describe systems that already exist.  Scientists have studied many pieces of the Kirtland’s warbler telecoupling, but we’re only just starting to study the interactions between those pieces. 

Scientists who have begun applying methods to study interactions generally stick within their respective disciplines.  Those that recognize the interactions between human activities and the environment either focus on a single location or ignore interactions with outside systems that affect habitats.

As we’ve seen with Kirtland’s warblers, all of those interactions matter and they are all addressed by telecoupling. 

As a scientist, I now have to figure out how to ask questions to learn from those interactions.  Wish me luck. 

 


shadow

Comments

Thanks from Joe

Thanks! I've located and downloaded a copy of the Ecotourism paper and will read it soon.

Answer from Jackie

Basically Kirtland's warblers are endangered, and cowbirds are not. Cowbirds historically did not overlap with Kirtland's warblers, since they tagged along with buffalo herds. Since the rise of agriculture, cowbirds extended their range into Kirtland's warbler territory. There were only a few Kirtland's warblers to begin with, so once scientists realized the effects of brood parasitism on KW, they started to treat cowbirds as an invasive species in areas overlapping with KW. It was a question of whether or not humans should become involved to prevent extinction of a species, but human-caused disturbance (e.g. agriculture) was the reason that cowbirds were introduced in the first place. There's actually some pretty interesting papers on the rise of "green" activities because people are beginning to accept the responsibility of trying to save species for which humans are the main cause of decline (check out Hvenegaard - "Ecotourism: a status report and conceptual framework").

Question

I enjoy your blogs and have read each one as they are published. I particularly like the clarity with which you write. I do, however, have one question:

Regarding "cowbird removal"... What makes cowbirds (doing what has been genetically successful for their species) second class avian citizens relative to Kirtland's Warblers?

Just curious on what grounds we choose winners and losers in the bird world.

Joe DeMonte

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.